SANCTIONS
purposes
ensure orders + directions complied with
punish defaulting party
NON-COMPLIANCE
Non-compliance with pre-action protocols
available sanctions:
order stay
order party at fault to pay costs proportionate to breach
order party at fault to pay indemnity costs
deprive C who is at fault of interest on damages / order interest at lower rate
award D who is at fault higher rate of interest on damages payable to C (PD pre-action conduct para 4.6)
parties must set out whether complied in claim form / particulars of claim (PD pre-action conduct para 9.7)
Non-compliance with CPR
various e.g. can't use undisclosed expert report at trial
Non-compliance with directions
agree new deadlines
if parties occasionally unable to keep to directions timetable, NOT usually problem, provided key dates kept (filing DQs, CMCs, PTRs, filing pre-trial checklists, trial) (r26.3(6A), r28.4, r29.5)
non-compliance through events beyond control / not deliberate
parties should co-operate and agree new timetable preserving key dates (r1.4(2)(a))
time specified by CPR / court for doing act can be varied by written agreement of parties (unless prohibited by rules) (r2.11)
procedure on default
innocent party should write letter to defaulting party:
asking for default to be remedied within reasonable period (7 / 14 days)
give warning of intention to apply for order if NOT remedied
if continued non-compliance
apply without delay for order to enforce compliance and / or sanction
court decides whether to make order compliance / sanctions (court may take any delay into account in deciding)
PRESERVATION OF TRIAL DATE
following apply on CMCs, applications to extend time + applications for relief from sanctions:
court will NOT allow failure to comply with directions, due to circumstances within parties' control lead to postponement of trial unless circumstances of case exceptional
if practicable, court will enable case to come for trial on date / period set:
assess steps party should take to prepare for trial
direct steps taken in shortest possible time
impose sanction for non-compliance
if 1+ issues are / can be made ready for trial at time set, court may direct that trial proceed on those issues AND order no costs for later trial of remaining issues / costs to be paid by party in default
if court has to postpone will for shortest possible time + will give directions to take steps in meantime as rapidly as possible
postponement = order of last resort - court may require party + legal rep to attend hearing where postponement sought
AVAILABLE SANCTIONS
how to apply?
hearings where court decides whether to impose sanctions arise in several ways:
on notice application for sanctions
application by defaulting party to extend time for compliance
CMC
pre-trial reviews
trial
levels of seriousness of default
minor breach - allow defaulter time to comply + adverse costs order on any interim application
serious breach - final order (state revised deadline is final, bearing proportionality in mind) + adverse costs order
breach of final order sanction on further application to court
more serious breach - if satisfied appropriate, unless order with stated sanction in default + adverse costs order
very serious breach - immediate sanction (may restrict evidence, value of claim, strike out)
Unless orders
often used for persistent default
if breached, other party may file request for judgment + costs (r3.5)
drafting unless orders
usual 'Unless C serves list of documents by 10 July 2014, his claim will be struck out and judgment entered for D'
if defaulting party did not attend hearing where order made 'Unless C serves list of documents within 14 days, his claim will be struck out and judgment entered for D'
test on expiry
has there been complete compliance (unless non-compliance de minimis)?
material non-compliance
sanction takes immediate effect (unless defaulting party applies for + obtains relief from it) (r3.8, PD 3A para 1.9)
extensions CANNOT be agreed between parties (r3.8(3))
procedure for obtaining judgment on orders providing SoC will be struck out
situation 1:
party in default is C; +
order strikes out whole particulars
D may enter judgment with costs by filing request stating right to enter judgment arisen because court order not complied with (r3.5(2)(a), (3))
situation 2:
party in default is D; +
order strikes out whole defence; +
claim limited to specified sum, damages +/or delivery of goods with alternative of paying value
C may enter judgment with costs by filing request stating right to enter judgment arisen because court order not complied with (r3.5(2)(b), (3))
situation 3:
neither (a) or (b) applies e.g. part of SoC struck out / D in default + C claims equitable relief
party seeking to enter judgment must make an application in accordance with part 23 i.e. issue application notice for hearing (r3.5(4))
Strike out
whole SoC
rare, reserved for most serious / repeated breaches, otherwise = disproportionate
disproportionate strike out deprives C of right of access to court (offends Art 6)
delay: only warrants strike out if impossible to have fair trial by using other sanctions
part of SoC
= immediate sanction suitable for less serious breaches (r3.4)
Less serious immediate sanctions
order defaulting party to pay costs fortwith
debar defaulting party from adducing evidence in particular form / from particular witnesses
deprive winning defaulting party of interest on money claim
increase defaulting party's interest
EXTENDING TIME
court has general power to
extend time (r3.1(2)(a))
on own initiative, even re: unless order (r3.1(1)(a), 3.3)
application to extend time
party who is / will be in default + has not been able to agree extension with other side may apply (r3.1)
court applies OO + main consideration = will delay cause prejudice to other side?
abridge time (r3.1(2)(a))
CORRECTING DEFECTIVE PERFORMANCE
general rules:
procedural errors do NOT invalidate step purportedly taken (unless court orders) (r3.10)
court may remedy error of procedure (r3.10(b)) + defaulting party should seek order if innocent party objects to defective procedure
significant defects where court may invalidate step:
other side misled
action taken does NOT constitute purported performance
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS + SETTING ASIDE
the two mechanisms to retrieve position after imposition of sanctions
if judgment entered for...