WITNESS STATEMENTS AND AFFIDAVITS
TYPES OF WRITTEN EVIDENCE
witness statements (WS)
witness summaries
informal document summarising evidence witness expected to give at trial
NOT used for interim applications
must obtain permission from court to use + only appropriate if practical problem in witness signing formal statement
affidavits
fee payable when sworn
sworn before solicitor / someone authorised to take oaths (jurat not statement of truth)
affirmations = secular affidavit
statements of case
must contain statement of truth
may be used as evidence in interim application if verified by statement of truth (PD 32 para 26.1) BUT usually need to supplement
application notice
must contain statement of truth
most informal (+ common) way of adducing evidence on interim application
COURT'S GENERAL POWER TO CONTROL EVIDENCE
court may:
give directions as to issues on which it requires evidence, the nature of evidence required to decide them + the way evidence placed before court (r32.1(1))
exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible (r32.1(2))
similar fact evidence
= witnesses all tell same story - must be telling truth (unless colluding)
admissible if:
substantially probative of issue(s) i.e. NOT only relevant to collateral matter; AND
no grounds why court should decline to admit
limit XX (r32.1(3))
gives court power to strike out scandalous, irrelevant or oppressive WS (used sparingly) (Sandhurst v Grosvenor)
AUTHENTICITY OF DISCLOSED DOCUMENTS
notice to admit facts (to narrow down issues) / produce documents
parties deemed to admit authenticity of documents disclosed to them
if wish to challenge, must serve notice to prove, which must specify documents being challenged + be served by latest date for serving witness statements OR within 7 days of disclosure (whichever is later) (r32.19)
notarial acts + instruments
can be received in evidence without further proof (unless contrary proved) (r32.20)
WITNESS STATEMENTS
definition
= a written statement signed by a person which contains the evidence which that person would be allowed to give orally (r32.4(1)
formal document - must contain statement of truth
court's power to control witness evidence
court may
give directions on witness evidence to: ID / limit issues, ID witnesses who may be called / evidence read + limit length / format of WSs (r32.2(3))
purpose: prevent excessive amounts of evidence
allow witness to give evidence via video link or any other means (r32.3)
trial
general rules
(unless rule, PD or court order requires otherwise) any fact required to be proved by WS to be proved by public oral evidence (r32.2(1))
evidence in chief at trial
where witness called, WS = evidence in chief (EIC) (unless court otherwise orders) (r32.5(2))
court may order otherwise if there are allegations of serious misconduct (JN Dairies)
witness giving oral evidence may amplify his WS + give evidence on new matters arising since service of WS IF the court gives permission, which it will only give if there is good reason NOT to confine evidence to WS (r32.5(3), (4))
exchange of WSs for use at trial
disclosure directions in fast + multi track cases
court will order party to disclose WS of witnesses party intends to call:
'court will order a party to serve on other parties any WS of the oral evidence which party serving intends to rely on in relation to any issues of fact to be decided at trial' (r32.4(2))
i.e. usually at allocation stage or CMC - court will give date by which WSs must be exchanged
sequential disclosure + whether to file
court may give directions on order the statements are to be filed in + whether or not they are to be filed (r32.4(3))
failure to serve
if fail to serve by date specified, witness CANNOT give oral evidence (unless court orders otherwise) (r32.10)
WS = properly served if signed (but NOT verified by statement of truth)
party may apply to enforce compliance / for sanctions (PD 28 para 5.1, PD 29 para 4.10)
court may strike out claim / defence (r3.4)
use at trial of WSs which have been served
if party has served a WS + wishes to rely on evidence of author at trial he party must call that witness (unless court orders otherwise OR he puts statement in as hearsay) (r32.5(1))
if party serves a WS and does NOT call witness / put WS in as hearsay any other party may put the WS in as hearsay (r32.5(5))
privilege
before disclosure, WS protected by legal professional privilege
by disclosing (serving) privilege waived (even if decide later NOT to call witness at trial) - hence r32.5(5)
XX
if witness gives oral evidence, may be XX on WS regardless of whether statement / part of it referred to during W's EIC
proceedings other than trial (i.e. interim applications)
general rule
(unless rule, PD or court order requires otherwise) any fact required to be proved by WS to be proved by written evidence (r32.2(2))
BUT party may rely on matters in SoC / application notice (if verified by statement of truth) (r32.5(2))
XX
if evidence given in writing, any party may apply to court for permission to XX person giving evidence (r32.7(1))
court may order witness to attend if convinced facts seriously challenged + good reasons to justify extra expense + delay
if permission granted and witness does NOT attend, evidence CANNOT be used (unless court gives permission) (r32.7(2))
availability of WSs for inspection by members of the public
general rule: WS standing as EIC / depositions given in evidence at trial (but NOT documents exhibited to WS - GIO Personal) is open to inspection during trial (unless court directs otherwise) (r32.13(1), r34.11(5))
any person may request direction that WS NOT open to inspection (32.13(2)) BUT court will NOT make a direction unless satisfied WS should NOT be open to inspection because of:
interests of justice
public interest
nature of expert medical evidence in WS
nature of confidential info (including financial)
need to protect interests of child / PP (r32.13(3))
court may exclude whole statement, words, or passages (r32.13(4))
collateral use
after statement exchanged, may only be used for purpose of proceedings in which it is served UNLESS + to the extent that
witness gives written consent;
court grants permission; or
statement put in evidence at public hearing
false statements
may bring contempt proceedings if person makes / causes to be made a false statement in document verified by statement of truth without honest belief in its truth (r32.14)
form
heading
title of proceedings, and if several parties with same status, no need to list all: A.B (and others) (PD 32 para 17.1)
top right hand corner of first page: party on whose behalf made, initials and surname of wtness, number of statement for that witness, indentifying initials and numbers of exhibits, date made (PD 32 para 17.2)
body of witness statement
must if practicable be in witness's own words
should be in first person
if giving evidence in professional capacity, should give address of where works, position, name of employer
state occupation / description
should state fact he is a (employee of) party to proceedings (PD 32 para 18.1)
must indicate which statements are from witness's own belief and which are matters of information or belief and their source (PD 32 para 18.2)
connected exhibits should be verified by and ID'd by witness an remain separate from statement (PD 32 para 18.3)
section on exhibits applies by analogy (PD 32 para 18.5)
if more than one witness statement with exhibits, number exhibits continue numbering consecutively across statements (PD 32 para 18.6)
exhibits should run sequentially across statements
format
A4 paper, 3.5cm margin, legible and typed on one side, bound (or if not endorsed with case number, initials of deponent and person before whom sworn), paginated, numbered paragraphs, numbers and dates expressed in figures, documents referenced in margin or in bold in body of text (PD 32 para 19.1)
usually follows chronological sequence of events (PD 32 para 19.2)
statement of truth
definition = statement of all evidence witness would give at trial and that statement maker (or litigation friend) believes the facts stated are true (r22.1(4), (5), PD 32 para 20)
'I believe that the facts state in this WS are true'
must be signed by the maker (r22.1(6)) + print full name
may be contained in document it verifies / document served separately, IDing document relates to (PD 22 para 1.5)
if NOT verified, court may decide inadmissible (r22.3)
WS = properly served if signed (but NOT verified by statement of truth)
alterations
must be initialled by maker or, if appropriate) authorised person, and if not, need permission of court to use in evidence (PD 32 para 22.1 and 22.2)
filing
if court directs affidavit to be filed must be filed in court / office or registry where action which it was or is to be used is proceeding or will proceed (PD 32 para 23.1)
certificate of court officer
attach if court orders (parts of) witness statement not open to public
WSs which do not comport with PD 32 (defective)
permission to file can be obtained from a judge in court where case proceeding, and court may: refuse to admit + refuse to allow costs arising from its preparation (PD 32 para 25.1 and 25.2)
false affidavits
may bring contempt proceedings if person makes / causes to be made a false statement in document verified by statement of truth without honest belief in its truth (r32.14)...