TRACK ALLOCATION AND CASE MANAGEMENT
WHICH JUDGE CAN MAKE CASE MANAGEMENT DECISIONS?
DJ, master or judge can make case management decisions, unless rule PD or enactment provides otherwise (r2.4)
RCJ - masters (PD 29 para 3.10)
district registry - DJs
coco - DJ or CJ
docketing (assigning case to 1 judge from issue to trial)
complex multi track cases only
PROVISIONAL TRACK ALLOCATION AND FILING DQs
D files defence
if hearing (e.g. SJ) happens before allocation, court may dispense with DQs, treat hearing as allocation hearing, make order for allocation and give case management directions (PD 26 para 2.4(a))
court officer provisionally allocates track
court officer serves notice of proposed allocation on each party:
requires parties to file DQ (at certain court) by specified date (CANNOT be varied):
date will be at least 14 days (small claims) / 28 days (fast / multi) after deemed service
parties file DQs AND pay fee (no fee in part 8 claim <1500)
must file DQ by date in notice of allocation
may be required to file:
draft proposed directions
costs budget
multi track - disclosure report
Failure to file DQ
designated money claims: (r26.3(7A))
court will serve further notice, requiring compliance within 7 days
if don't comply within 7 days SoC struck out
other claims: (r26.3(8))
court will make order considers appropriate
directions of own initiative / list case for case management conference / strike out / enter default judgment (PD 26A para 2.5(3)
costs sanctions for all claims: defaulting party
will NOT get order for costs of app to set aside / vary order nor of attending case management conference
will be ordered to pay costs caused by default to other party (unless court thinks unjust)
Non-payment of allocation fee
automatic strike out after due warning from court (r3.7)
court sends D notice explaining that any II will cease to have effect after 14 days unless C applies to reinstate prompts D to apply for costs against defaulting C
court can reinstate claim - conditional on payment within 2 days of order (if C present at hearing) / 7 days of service (if C not present at hearing)
STAY FOR ADR
parties can request 1 month stay in DQ - granted if all parties request (court can extend by request in writing from parties)
court can also grant 1 month of its own initiative
C must tell court if reach settlement
if at end of stay no settlement reached case management + track allocation
TRACK ALLOCATION
Procedure (continued from above)
if necessary, court may hold allocation hearing (r25.5(4))
when is track allocated? (r25.5(1))
when all parties file DQ / when making order for non-compliance of non-designated money claim under r26.3(8)
exceptions
stay for ADR - allocate at end of stay
case automatically transferred - after transfer by destination court
default judgment / judgment on admission - give directions, if necessary allocate track
when track allocated, court will serve notice of allocation on every party (r29.9)
court may subsequently re-allocate to different track (r26.10)
if dissatisfied with allocation
party should appeal if order made at hearing at which he was present / represented / given notice of (PD 26A para 11.1(2))
otherwise, should apply to court to re-allocate (PD 26A para 11.1(3)) - court usually gives 3 days' notice of hearing (PD 28 para 4.3(b))
if change in circumstances since allocation, court may re-allocate on application or of own initiative
Small claims track
GENERAL RULE - any straightforward claim with a value of not more than 10k
PI and death - value of claim not more than 10k + PSLA damages not more than 1k
Claims by residential tenants against landlords
for repairs not more than 1k + damages not more than 1k
NOT certain claims for harassment / unlawful eviction (r26.7(3))
NOT disputed allegations of dishonesty (PD 26A para 8.1(d))
Fast track
small claims NOT normal track +
can deal with justly on fast track (PD 26A para 9.1(1)) +
value of not more than 25k+
trial likely to last for no longer than 1 day (5 hours), though NOT necc conclusive (PD 26A para 9.1(3)) +
oral expert evidence at trial limited to 1 expert per party per field + expert evidence in 2 fields
court also consider likely case management directions and court's power to control evidence and XX (PD 26A para 9.1(3)
Multi track
following allocated to multi track:
if small claims / fast track NOT normal track
issue of public importance
test case
medical negligence case
case where right to trial by jury
Matters court considers in allocating track
the financial value, if any, of the claim;
if no financial value, choose most suitable, having regard to all matters (r26.7(2))
the nature of the remedy sought;
the likely complexity of the facts, law or evidence;
the number of parties or likely parties;
the value of any counterclaim or other Part 20 claim and the complexity of any matters relating to it;
where the claim involves 1+ money claim, court will only take into account largest (won't aggregate)
the amount of oral evidence which may be required;
the importance of the claim to non-parties;the views expressed by the parties (not binding); and
the circumstances of the parties.
SMALL CLAIMS TRACK
CPR provisions which don't apply to small claims (r27.2)
most interim remedies (except IIs)
standard disclosure (more limited applies)
most rules on experts (need permission of court for oral / written expert evidence (r27.5))
requests for further info can only be made by court (r27.2(3))
part 36 offers
Standard directions
standard direction =
parties shall file + serve on other side copies of documents intend to rely on no later than 14 days before hearing
original documents to be brought to hearing
notice of hearing date + length of hearing (hearing fee payable within 14 days of the notice)
parties should contact each other with view to settlement / narrowing issues + obligation to inform court if settlement reached
inform parties expert evidence NOT allowed without court's express permission
Special directions
witness statements
if necessary, need special direction
criteria for making WS order:
whether parties represented
amount in dispute
nature of matters in dispute
whether ordering party to give further info would be better at clarifying case
access to justice without undue formality, cost, delay (PD 27 para 2.5)
expert evidence
if necessary, need special direction + must mention in DQ
limited to expert's report unless oral evidence in interests of justice (r35.5(2))
Prelim hearing
court may hold to limit expense where
special directions needed to ensure fair hearing + necessary for party to attend court so understands how to comply; OR
strike out / summary judgment suitable
must give parties 14 days' notice of prelim hearing date (r27.6(3))
may treat as final hearing if parties agree (r27.6(4))
Disposal without a hearing - may if all parties agree (r27.10)
Final hearing
usually dealt with by coco DJ in chambers
general (r27.8)
court may adopt any fair method
informal
strict rules of evidence do NOT apply
court need not take evidence on oath
court may limit XX
court must give reasons for decision
representation
intention for parties to represent selves
corporate body may be represented by any of employees (PD27 para 3.2(4))
legal representation common if part(ies) have insurance
individual or company may have lay representative only if client attends (PD 27 para 3.2(2))
Rehearings (r27.11)
party who did not attend final hearing or give written notice may apply to set aside order made in absence + order for rehearing
must apply within 14 days of absent party being notified of judgment
allowed only if good reason for absence + absent party has reasonable prospect of success
Costs (very restricted)
no costs between parties except: (r27.14)
fixed costs re: issue of claim
injunction / specific performance claims: cost of legal advice and assistance up to 260
court fees (issue fee, allocation fee (if claim worth more than 1500), hearing fee)
reasonably incurred witnesses' expenses
loss of earnings up to 90 / day
experts' fees up to 750 / expert
costs resulting from unreasonable behaviour (rare)
in appeals, cost of approved transcript
stage 1 and 2 costs under RTA protocol not paid by D where C reasonably believed claim exceeded small claims limit
if party has behaved unreasonably court may make summary assessment of costs in favour of innocent party
if case is reallocated, fast / multi track rules on costs apply from date of re-allocation (r27.15)
FAST TRACK - standard timetable - very useful + need to know - see Sime p.307
Listing hearing - court may hold before confirming trial date (rare)
Agreed directions
parties encouraged to agree directions and file with DQ
if suitable, court will simply approve
must deal with: timetable, trial date, disclosure, WSs, expert evidence (in accordance with rules for standard directions below)
Standard allocation directions
court will give case management directions when allocates track:
timetable - for steps pre-trial N.B. trial timetable
trial date
fix trial date (or trial period not exceeding 3 weeks) no more than 30 weeks later (r28.2) - specified in notice of allocation
disclosure of documents
standard disclosure (r28.3(1)(a)) = serve list of documents by certain date, usually 28 days after service of notice of allocation (PD28 para 3.12)
no disclosure (r28.3(2)(a))
specify documents / classes of documents parties must disclose (r28.3(2)(b))