COSTS
COURT'S DISCRETION
court may make costs order at any time (PD 44 para 4.1)
court has discretion as to: whether costs payable, amount + when to be paid (r44.2(1))
court must have regard to all circumstances including:
conduct of parties:
before (particularly extent pre-action protocols followed) + during proceedings
whether reasonable to raise / pursue / contest allegation issue
manner party defended case / pursued particular allegation or issue
whether wholly / partly successful C exaggerated claim
whether party succeeded on case, even if only in part
admissible offer to settle (except Part 36)
BASIS OF ASSESSMENT
court will NOT allow unreasonably incurred costs OR costs unreasonable in amount (r44.3(1))
in assessing whether reasonable (+ proportionate if standard basis), court will:
give effect to any orders already made (r44.4(2))
have regard to:
conduct of parties (before + during proceedings AND settlement attempts)
amount / value of money / property
importance of matter to all parties
complexity of matter / difficulty of Qs raised
skill, effort, specialised responsibility involved
time spent on case
place + circumstances in which any work done
receiving party's last approved / agreed costs budget (r44.4(3))
Standard basis
only includes costs which are:
proportionate
bear reasonable relationship to:
sums in issue
value of non-monetary relief in issue
complexity of litigation
extra work generated by paying party's conduct
wider factors e.g. reputation (r44.4(5))
reasonably incurred
reasonable in amount
any doubt re: reasonableness / proportionality of costs resolved in favour of paying party (r44.3(2)(b))
Indemnity basis
only includes costs which are:
reasonably incurred; AND
reasonable in amount
any doubt re: reasonableness of costs resolved in favour of receiving party (r44.3(3))
time for compliance with costs order
party must comply within 14 days of:
summary assessment: date of judgment / order if states amount of costs; OR
detailed assessment: date of certificate stating amount (part 47); OR
such other date as court specifies (r44.7)
METHODS OF ASSESSMENT
Summary assessment (SA) = court determines costs immediately at end of hearing, on rough + ready basis
when is SA suitable / made
conclusion of fast-track trial (order will deal with costs of whole claim); AND
conclusion of any other hearing lasting up to 1 day e.g. interim hearing
who can make?
NOT court officer, only judge (PD 44 para 9.7)
who CANNOT get summary assessment
receiving party who is:
publicly funded
child / PP (unless their rep waives right to further costs) (PD 44 para 9.8, 9.9(1))
N.B. court may make summary assessment of costs payable by child / PP
procedure
each party intending to claim costs must:
prepare written statement of costs
show separately in schedule:
number of hours
hourly rate
grade of fee earner
amount + nature of disbursement (excluding counsel's fee for hearing)
amount of legal rep's fee for hearing
counsel's fees
VAT (PD 44 para 9.5(1), (2))
sign statement OR get legal rep to sign it
include certificate at end of form N260 unless party is
assisted person
LSC funded
entitled to civil legal services under LASPO
represented by own employee (PD 44 para 9.5(3))
file statement at court
serve copy on all parties against whom costs intended to be sought ASAP, and in any event
fast track - not less than 2 days before trial
all other hearings - not less than 24 hours before time of hearing (PD 44 para 9.5(4))
if fail to serve, proportionate response - adjourn for detailed assessment / summary assessment at later date
time for payment - party must pay within 14 days of date of judgment / order
Detailed Assessment (DA)
costs judge considers amount at assessment hearing after parties have had opportunity to set out amount claimed + points of dispute in writing
when?
generally - conclusion of proceedings
BUT court may order them to be assessed immediately (r47.1)
authorised court officer
has all powers of court when making detailed assessment except power to make:
wasted costs order
order in relation to misconduct (r44.11)
sanction for delay in commencing detailed assessment (r47.8)
detailed assessment of costs payable to a solicitor by their client (unless paid to child / PP) (r47.3(1)
if party objects to court officer assessing, court may order costs judge / DJ to make (r47.3(2))
venue for DA
must make application / request to OR file at appropriate office (r47.4(1)):
court may direct appropriate office = costs office (r47.4(3))
coco may direct appropriate office = another coco, without transferring proceedings to that court (r47.4(3), (4))
procedure for DA if costs not agreed
bill of costs - receiving party prepares
commencement - by receiving party
commence within 3 months of judgment (/ discontinuance / acceptance of part 36 offer)
if don't commence in time
paying party can apply for order requiring commencement court can disallow receiving party's costs
if don't apply for order, court may only disallow interest
commenced by receiving party serving on paying party:
notice of commencement; AND
copy of bill of costs (r47.6(1))
points of dispute - by paying party
paying party may dispute any item in bill of costs by serving points of dispute on receiving party within 21 days of service of notice of commencement
if fail to serve receiving party may file request for default costs certificate
court may set aside certificate if good reason for proceedings to continue
receiving party may serve reply within 21 days of service of points of dispute
request for DA hearing - by receiving party
receiving party must file request for DA hearing within 3 months of end of time for commencement
if don't file in time, sanctions same as failure to commence in time - disallow costs / interest
DA hearing - only points specified in points of dispute can be raised
procedure where costs agreed
either party may apply to court for costs certificate
provisional assessment (shortened procedure)
applies to proceedings commenced in HC OR CC on / after 1 April 2013 in which costs <75,000
AVAILABLE ORDERS
Costs follow the event
general rule = loser pays (r44.2(2))
starting point = winner gets whole costs of proceedings, even if doesn't win on all issues / there is a finding of contrib
Exceptions where costs do NOT follow event
probate and family proceedings in CA
costs of application to extend time: party applying pays
failure to make admissions / produce document after service of notice / list of documents: party failing pays cost of proving
successive claims against persons liable for same damage: only C in first claim awarded costs (unless reasonable grounds for bringing later claims)
Specific situations
multiple parties
multiple Ds:
C wins
costs ordered against each D
C can recover against any 1+ Ds
paying Ds can seek contribution from others (Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978)
if Ds separately represented, D only liable for extra cost if separate representation reasonable
some Ds win, some lose
winning Ds get general costs of proceedings number of Ds
Bullock and Sanderson orders
eg: C v D1 + D2, AND C succeeds against D1 but NOT D2
Bullock: C ordered to pay D2’s costs, D1 is ordered to pay C’s costs and to reimburse for costs paid by C to D2. Truer form of costs following the event, more usual.
Sanderson: D1 ordered to pay C’s costs and D2’s costs. Protects C against insolvency.
multiple issues
part 20 claims
If D has made additional claim under part 20, and succeeds in claiming an indemnity, then if C is successful, 3rd party will be ordered to pay D’s costs including D's order to pay C's costs.
If D is insolvent, there may be an order for C’s costs directly to 3rd party.
If C loses, ordered to pay costs of all proceedings, even D’s Part 20 claim IF it was reasonable.
set offs (r44.3(9))
can be ordered e.g. if C successful in claim and D successful in counterclaim, will have costs paid for by each other, so set off.
litigants under a disability
cost orders made against litigation friends
litigation friend usually indemnified by C, unless was for own personal benefit or lit friend is guilty of misconduct in the proceedings.
trustees + PRs - entitled to recover costs from the fund unless court orders otherwise (if have acted unreasonably).
costs after appeal - after a successful appeal costs can be ordered for proceedings before appeal as well as appeal itself (r44.10(4))
nominal + minimal damages - court may treat C as loser, and order to pay D's costs
unreasonable refusal of ADR - burden on loser to show unreasonableness in application to disallow winner's costs
claims wrongly commenced in HC - winner's costs reduced to up to 25%
Misconduct / partial win
general orders for misconduct
court can disallow all / part of costs being assessed; OR
order party at fault to pay costs they have caused other party to incur (r44.11(2))
orders if winner G of misconduct / only partial win - party must pay:
proportion of winner's costs
specified amount of winner's costs
costs from / till certain date
costs incurred before proceedings begun
costs re: particular steps in proceedings
costs re: distinct part of proceedings [only if NOT practicable to make order under (a) or (c) instead (i.e. last resort)]