CASE MANAGEMENT: ALLOCATION, DIRECTIONS AND SANCTIONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE
Overriding Objective CPR 1.1 – OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE – To deal with cases justly and at a proportionate cost CPR 1.2 – Duties of parties to help the court further the overriding objective CPR 1.4 – Duty of the court to actively manage cases | Case Management CPR 3.1 – Court’s general powers of management CPR 3.3 – Court’s power to make an order of its own initiative CPR 3.4 – Power to strike out CPR 3.8 – Sanctions (unless defaulting party obtains relief) CPR 3.9 – Summary judgement | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Where the claim is defended then, on receipt of the defence, the court provisionally decides the appropriate track for the claim and serves on each party notice of the track allocation;
The starting point for allocation is financial value:
| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| PD 28 3.12 – the typical timetable the court may give for preparation of the case:
PD 28 4.2(2) – the parties can vary directions that the court gives within 14 days | |||||||||||||
|
There are dates which you cannot extend by consent and require courts permission (return of pre-trial check list, CMC/PTR and trial date or window (CPR 28.4 or CPR 29.5) | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| CPR 3.8(1) – on the application for relief from any sanction imposed for a failure to comply with any rule, practice direction or court order, the court will consider all of the circumstances of the case, so as to enable it to deal justly with the application, including the need –
CPR 3.8(2) – An application must be supported by evidence Three-stage Test For Relief From Sanctions Denton v TH White Ltd [2014]
|