SUMMARY JUDGMENT
| Procedure for Obtaining Summary Judgment | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPR 24.2 | The court may give summary judgment against a claimant or defendant on the whole of a claim or on a particular issue if –
| |
| PD 24 1.3 | An application for summary judgment under rule 24.2 may be based on:
| |
| CPR 3.3(1)&(4) | The courtcandirect ofitsown initiative that a claim or issue be summarily dismissed. | |
| CPR 23.6 | The procedure is that specified under CPR 23. | |
| Form N244 | Applicantsmust state that the application is made under CPR 24. | |
| CPR 23.7(3) | The application notice must be served with a copy of any written evidence in support and a copy of the draft order. Applicants must identify the point of law or document to be relied on and state the grounds formakingtheapplication. | |
Legal Test
| CPR 24.2 | The court may give summary judgment against a claimant or defendant on the whole of a claim or on a particular issue if –
|
|---|---|
| International Finance Corp v Utexafrica Sprl | Real means D has to have a case which is better than merely arguable |
| Swain v Hillman | To decide whether a prospect is real does not involve the court conducting a mini-trial. |
| ED & F Man Liquid Products v Patel | Burden of proof is on C to show D’s case has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason why disposal of the claim should await trial. |
| D’s case must carry some degree of conviction. The court is not required to accept without analysis everything said by a party in his statement before the court | |
| Callard v Financial Conduct Authority | In evaluating prospects of success, judges are not required to abandon their critical faculties. |
| Royal Brompton Hospital v Hammond | When deciding whether D has a defence with a real prospect of success, court should also consider the evidence that could reasonably be expected to be available at trial. |
| ICI Chemicals & Polymers Ltd v TTE Training Ltd | The court should not allow a case to go forward to trial simply because there is a possibility of some further evidence arising. |
| Eilon & Associates Ltd v Easygroup IP Licensing Ltd | If a counterclaim is used as a set-off, it must particularise the financial loss alleged. |
| Apvodedo NV v Collins | It is not appropriate on a summary judgment application to resolve a complex question of law and fact, the determination of which necessitates a trial of the issue having regard to all the evidence. |
| AIS Pipework Ltd v Saxlund International Ltd | C may be prevented from obtaining summary judgment if D can show that he intends to raise a set off or counterclaim which raises a triable issue – i.e. has some prospect of succeeding. |
| Addax Bank BSC v Wellesley Partners LLP | Where the alleged value of... |