General p.183 |
|
---|---|
Structure p.184 | PD 32 para 17.1: headed with title of proceedings and the top right corner should state under PD 32 para 17.2:
PD 32 para 19.1: a witness statement should:
|
Own Words | PD 32 para 18.1: it should be made in witnesses own words (in the first person) as far as practical:
PD 32 para 18.2: the statement must indicate:
|
Exhibits | PD 32 para 18.3 requires any exhibit used in conjunction with a witness statement to be verified and identified by the witness and remain separate from the statement PD 32 para 18.6: if a witness makes more than one statement to which there are exhibits, the numbering of the exhibits should run consecutively (i.e. not start again on each statement) PD 32 para 18.4: an exhibit should be referred to as: “I refer to the (description of exhibit) marked…” |
Statement of Truth | PD 32 para 20.2: must signed and in the following format:
CPR r.22.3: if there Is no witness statement, or another part of the statement is lacking or defective, then the court could refuse to admit it as evidence |
Use at Trial |
|
Extension |
|
EXAM PREP
Witness statements Drafting
P 184 = Formalities
P361 = Template (Includes references to relevant PD 32 articles)
P448 = Specimen
Workshop 11 Task 1 (interview and the attached blue Witness Statement)
In the EXAM you may be asked to draft/review/comment a witness statement. (Check the green sheet in Workshop 11 Task 1) So watch out for:
Is it in the witness’s own words? P.184
Does it comply with CPR 32? P.184
Does it contain hearsay evidence and if is it a problem? P.188
Does it contain inadmissible opinions? P.187
Does it contain obvious “hostages of fortune”? i.e. things that do not support my case/negatively affect my case (if it does, and you are drafting the witness statement then, do not include them in your draft)
Does it contain irrelevant information?
Admissible v Inadmissible evidence in Witness Statements | |
---|---|
Admissible evidence | Inadmissible evidence |
|