NOTE:
There must be a duty, breach, causation, loss element to every part of the claim. This is crucially important and where most of the marks will be.
Do it in order:
Duty, Breach, Causation Loss
Precedent (i.e. statement of truth, pre-action conduct, loss, interest claim
Minor corrections (i.e. dates, names, figures)
(ensure claim number correct)
IN THE CENTRAL LONDON HIGH COURT (get court right; High/County Court?)
B E T W E E N
GREEN INVESTMENTS PLC (make sure correct)
Ensure in the right order: - Claimant (or claimants)
-and-
[here, either put name of each partner or company name and (the ‘Firm’)
(1) TOM JONES
(2) SIMON JONES etc.
Ensure in the right order: - Defendant (or defendants)
_______________________
PARTICULARS OF CLAIM
(not Statement of Case)
_______________________
At all material times the First Defendant (or just ‘Defendant’ if suing firm) was a [Position of Defendant] in a [type of company] known as [name of company].
On 27 April 2011 (numbers and dates in figures not words) the Claimant (capitalised) entered into a contract with the Defendant for the supply of consultancy services.
Go on to describe events… Ensure they are correct, the figures are correct.
Be sure to establish:
Duty
“It was an implied term of the Retainer that in acting for the Claimant, the First Defendant would exercise the care and skill to be expected from a reasonably competent [position of Defendant]. Further or alternatively, the First Defendant owed a like duty at Common Law”.
Breach
Paragraph [x] – “In providing advice to the Claimant, the First Defendant:
Particulars of Breach
Paragraph [x.i] – The product was [X]…
Paragraph [x.ii] – Failed to advise…”
Paragraph [y] – “Given the paragraphs [x.i] to [x.ii] inclusive, the Defendants are in breach of the implied terms and/or in breach of the said duty at common law that they owed to the Claimant in that they did not exercise the care and skill reasonably to be expected from [position of Defendant]”.
Causation
Example 1: “Had the First Defendant correctly advised the Claimant, it would not have [did whatever it did]. Further it would not have [did the second thing it did]. Accordingly, the Claimant has suffered loss amounting to the costs of [x] from the date of [x]”.
Example 2: “As a result of the agreement reached with [3rd party], the Claimant was obliged to [do whatever it did] at a cost of [x] for the purpose of [y]. The Claimant also incurred [other losses such as legal costs and expenses].
Mock examples: “As a result of the breach in [para X], the Claimant had to purchase replacement [Y] from an alternative supplier at the cost of [Z]. The sourcing of such alternative [Y] was the only way the Claimant could fulfil its obligations to [Client]. Despite this, the Claimant has subsequently lost the business of its client, [Client]. It has therefore suffered a substantial loss in profits”.
“Further, as a result of the breaches set out above, the Claimant has suffered damaged to its reputation”.
Loss
As a result of said breaches, the Claimant has suffered loss and damage.
PARTICULARS OF LOSS AND DAMAGE
Item Date (may include further VAT column)
[x] [y] Amount claimed
TOTAL [x] amount underlined
The Claimant also seeks damages for damage to its reputation.
[Paragraph on Interest]
The Claimant is entitled to interest on such damages as are awarded to it...